A history of my early thoughts about foreskins (!),
continued from here.
I grew up in a sex-positive family-- back before that was a thing to be. There was nothing shameful or dirty about nakedness at home. I shared bath-time with friends that were girls and friends that were boys. I enjoyed skinny-dipping (still do.)
By the time I reached puberty, I'd developed, among other things, a sense of personal modesty that meant I was less likely to want to be naked around people of the opposite sex. Still, even when I was quite young I had a good idea what penises looked like, and had seen a number of them.
But they were all circumcised.
I remember looking at Roman statuary, and coming to the conclusion that the Church must have forbidden carving penises in all their naughty detail, since none of them had visible glans. I figured it was the Roman version of a Ken doll's amorphous plastic junk.
I had no idea what a foreskin was, or what it looked like. I remember my family, sitting in the car in the driveway, listening to Dad trying to explain circumcision. All three of us females (my mom, my sister, and I) were rapt-- fascinated and confused, and full of questions.
"But what does it look like?"
"It's a hood, that protects the end of the penis."
"A hood?!"
"Yes. And it can trap dirt, and be hard to keep clean. So it's trimmed away."
"But it's a hood? Like a monk?"
"No. It comes up over the head of the penis from below."
"But how do you... how do you have sex with something like that?"
"It retracts."
"But how?"
Dad kept talking, to little effect. I decided an uncircumcised penis must look like a jack-in-the-pulpit, or a calla lily.
Well, that's just ridiculous. Of course they cut that off. How could you fit it in your pants?
I couldn't picture how men managed before they figured out circumcision. I couldn't imagine anyone not being circumcised, unless they they lived in some benighted land and had no choice.
If the internet had been around back then, I'm sure I could have set myself straight much earlier. As it was, I was in college, and had a handful of notches on my proverbial lipstick case, before I encountered an uncircumcised penis in the flesh-- a nice guy from Dublin that I used to work with. Actually, I've only personally encountered two uncircumcised penises, and the other was attached to a guy from Dublin as well (no, not at the same time.)
I was a little taken aback, at first. Sort of a "Huh, so that's what that looks like. Should I do anything different?"
But no, it worked pretty much the same. And it wasn't gross, or smelly, or any of the awful things I'd heard about uncircumcised penises my whole life. Honestly, beyond the appearance I didn't really notice any difference at all.
I'm reminded of an encounter with an English girl who worked at a crafts studio with me, here in the city, one summer about ten years ago. She was only in the States for a few months, so she was trying to squeeze every drop from her New York experience by going out to the clubs every night after work. She'd met this nice guy, and they'd gone dancing a few nights running before she agreed to go to his place.
He was circumcised. "I had no idea what to do," she said the next day. "All my tricks for foreplay involve playing with the foreskin. Are all American guys circumcised?"
The rest of my coworkers agreed: "Most of them."
That's when I started to realize that people from other parts of the world, certainly those that hail from the British Isles, have a very different attitude about foreskins than Americans do.
Still, it didn't seem to me to be much of a big deal either way. I figured it was like the differences between British and American tailoring-- do you like a snugger sleeve? A roomier crotch? It's all just a matter of taste.
Isn't it?